| THINKING
THE UNTHINKABLE
Financial planners recommend that
you take responsibility for your own protection and let your company supplement
your efforts.
By Suh-kyung Yoon/HONG KONG
Far Eastern Economic Review Issue
cover-dated November 29, 2001
IT'S EASY TO FORGET ABOUT insurance
when you're drawing up a financial plan. Many people don't even think of
it as an investment vehicle since insurance provides no returns--except,
of course, in the worst-case scenario. But insurance should be the first
thing you invest in before even setting up a savings or investment strategy.
"The problem with insurance is that when you need it most, you can't have
it," says Chris Beale of Towry Law, which advises clients on wealth-management
issues. "That's why it pays to start early and invest in it for the future."
Many people simply rely on their
employers to handle all of their insurance issues for them. But no matter
how good the benefits package is, it comes with the job. What if you lose
your job? What happens when you move on? With so many switching jobs almost
once a year in places like Hong Kong, financial planners suggest that people
take responsibility for their own insurance foundation. Instead of taking
out your own policies to supplement the ones provided by your employer,
you should think of it as the reverse. Your own personal policies should
be the mainstay of your coverage, with the company's offerings as a bonus.
Life insurance is the first policy
most people should invest in but here are some others that you should consider.
MORTGAGE PROTECTION
If you have a mortgage, you should
get some kind of coverage that will repay the outstanding mortgage in the
event of your or your spouse's death. The typical cost of mortgage cover
is $310 per month for every $1 million assured.
INCOME PROTECTION
Most companies don't provide insurance
for income loss and those that do fall far short of what is needed. In
our example, John Wong's case ( see page 48), he was protected for $1 million
by his employer. Unfortunately, that would only provide $50,000 per year
of replacement income were Wong unable to work. Andrew Barber, CEO of wealth-manager
Barber Asia, says you should have a policy that could guarantee two-thirds
of your current salary. For Wong, that would be $100,000, so the level
of cover should be $2 million. The key issue here is that although incapacity
is far more likely than death, most people take out life assurance and
neglect income protection. This type of cover should be set up for both
John and his wife Fiona. The typical cost per $300,000 of cover is $35
per month.
CRITICAL ILLNESS COVER
Like most insurance products, this
one is generally overlooked. However statistics show that 1 in 4 men and
1 in 5 women will suffer from cancer, a heart attack or other critical
illnesses before reaching 65. Barber recommends that both John and Fiona
Wong be insured for critical illness. The typical cost of a $300,000 policy
is $110 a month.
EDUCATION FEES PROTECTION
You might also want to set up a
policy that protects your children's education fees upon your death. But
some policies can also provide you with significant savings by making early
provisions against the long-term total cost of education. For example,
the average cost of school fees in Britain is between £6,000 ($9,000)
and £9,000 a year, increasing 7%-10% per annum.
University fees are often less than
that but an MBA course could cost up to $30,000 per year. For the Wongs,
the cost of sending two kids through school and university in Britain over
the next 15 years could be as much as £250,000. Investing £150,000
in a policy now could provide for all these fees, assuming a 5%-7% return
and a 10% escalation in fees each year.
extracted from Far Eastern Economic
Review
Issue November 29, 2001
|